Sie sind noch kein Fidelity Kunde?
Eröffnen Sie zunächst ein FondsdepotPlus. Danach können Sie aus unseren Fonds und ETFs Ihre Favoriten wählen.
Sie sind bereits Fidelity Kunde?
Melden Sie sich in Ihrem Depot an, um Fondsanteile zu ordern oder Ihren Sparplan anzulegen oder anzupassen.
Fixed Income Monthly - March 2026
Position defensively as macro risks diverge
The events in the Middle East are, above all, a human tragedy, and we extend our deepest sympathies to those directly affected.
For markets, the conflict adds a fourth major driver to an already complex backdrop. Investors are weighing AI-driven disinflation and potential labour market weakness, the path of US inflation and monetary policy, emerging stresses in private credit, and escalating tensions in the Middle East. Each points in a different macro direction, increasing uncertainty and complicating asset allocation.
Attention is currently fixed on the Middle East. Our base case is that markets will look through the conflict over time, with energy prices reflecting a risk premium rather than a structural repricing. However, fiscal consequences may prove more persistent. A prolonged conflict would likely widen deficits as governments fund higher defence spending and cost-of-living support, leading to increased sovereign issuance.
We remain cautious given the scale of the conflict and the lack of a clear resolution path. Further downside is possible, particularly if US economic resilience falters. Heightened geopolitical risk and shifting policy signals may delay corporate investment and hiring, reinforcing economic softness.
US Treasuries are caught between safe-haven flows and inflation concerns. The labour market remains pivotal: weaker data would support a more accommodative Federal Reserve and benefit duration. Markets have already reduced expected Fed easing this year from two 25 basis point cuts to one. Absent an inflation spiral, central banks are more likely to delay easing than materially alter reaction functions. In Europe, volatility and firm inflation have similarly reduced the likelihood of ECB cuts this year.
Recent price action has often reflected positioning rather than fundamentals. Heavily owned assets have seen the sharpest moves regardless of direct exposure. The South African rand, for example, sold off despite limited Middle East linkage, largely due to crowded positioning. Distinguishing between fundamental risk and crowding remains essential.
In credit, we anticipate a heavy issuance calendar as delayed deals come to market, potentially creating attractive concessions. Even so, we remain opportunistic given structural vulnerabilities, particularly liquidity risks in private markets.
A more constructive element has been the measured response from emerging markets. Egypt has allowed its currency to weaken while supplying dollars to manage outflows, and Turkey has stabilised conditions by repricing the front end. Elsewhere, policy adjustments have been limited.
With four divergent narratives in play, disciplined risk management, selectivity in credit and a focus on liquidity are paramount. In this environment, resilience matters more than reflex.
Marion Le Morhedec
Global CIO, Fixed Income
The Fixed Income Monthly provides a forward-looking summary of the medium-term views from Fidelity’s Fixed Income team. Our investment approach is multi-strategy, with portfolio managers given clear accountability and fiduciary responsibility for all investment decisions in a portfolio. Given this portfolio manager discretion, there may at times be differences between strategies applied and the views presented in this document. We believe in managing portfolios with a mix of active investment strategies, including top-down and bottom-up, such that no single strategy dominates risk.
Source: Fidelity International, Bloomberg, JPM and ICE BofA Merrill Lynch bond indices, 3 March 2026. Yield to maturity for all instruments except HY and EM (yield to worst), USD loans (yield to 3yrs), and inflation-linked bonds (real yield). Hybrids universe defined as 50% Corporate Hybrids and 50% Financial Hybrids indices.
Source: Fidelity International, ICE, Bloomberg, 28 February 2026. JPM and ICE BofA bond indices for total returns. ICE BofA Merrill Lynch Q490 Index for Asia high yield. *1 Month returns for Emerging Markets are calculated from 30 January 2026 to 27 February 2026.
Outlook
After a significant escalation in the Middle East, with the US and Israel launching attacks on Iran, the conflict has spread across the region. From a markets perspective, the first-order impact has been on oil, which is facing a supply squeeze given the Strait of Hormuz, responsible for 20% of global oil in transit, has become impassable.
Crude oil futures prices have spiked since the onset of war. This supply shock and increase in risk premium has second-order impacts across rates, inflation and currencies.
Oil drives a large portion of energy prices, which are a core component of inflation. We have had longstanding positions that protect us from rising forward inflation expectations. We have since added to these as we still feel the level of risk priced into US and UK inflation swaps is too low.
On rates, rising inflationary pressure typically pushes markets to expect more hawkish central bank behaviour. As a result, bond yields tend to rise, which is bad for duration positioning. At the headline level, we have reduced duration risk for this reason.
Simple model of US rates, oil and the economy
Source: Fidelity International, Bloomberg, 4 March 2026.
A simple model of WTI oil prices and the Citi Economic Surprise Index can explain a large portion of the moves in 5-year Treasuries since mid-2023. But recently this relationship has decoupled, with Treasuries falling under dovish expectations. As a result, we are keen to stay underweight in US duration.
An oil shock is bad news for energy importers, including most of Asia and Europe, so their currencies are likely to weaken against the US dollar. We have reduced our USD short positioning as we expect to see some short-term strength. Valuation-wise, we have a bearish medium-to-long term outlook on USD versus EM FX, but we could see some more strength in the short term.
We remain short Sterling, which funds long positions in BRL, CHF and NOK. Rising energy prices are likely to weaken the UK’s term of trade, given its reliance on energy imports. We also see rising unemployment in the UK with only one 25bps rate cut priced this year, which could be insufficient. Instead of a long duration position, which presents the risk of Gilts selling off due to fiscal uncertainty, we prefer to be short GBP.
Where is the volatility in rates and equities?
Source: Bloomberg, 5 March 2026.
Elsewhere, risk assets have long been priced for perfection, where equity and credit valuations appear to assume little-to-no material risks. We have started to see some of this unwind, with falling equities and widening credit spreads. But these assets are still historically rich and could be subject to further cheapening.
We have been short US and European credit spreads for over a year, given little opportunity for value compared to government bonds. The negative carry we pay to protect ourselves from a selloff is relatively cheap as markets are currently pricing little volatility in credit. This is also a cheap hedge against our risk-on positioning in EM local currency debt.
Outlook
Global IG credit returned 1.1% in February with spreads widening by 10bps overall. Government bond yields rallied amid a moderate sell-off in risk assets which supported the total return profile of investment grade credit.
We are broadly underweight credit risk across our funds as spreads remain tight compared to history. This means that the risk-return profile from being overweight credit risk is asymmetric and skewed to the downside.
Credit spreads are still priced for perfection
Source: Fidelity International, Bloomberg, February 2026
Our defensive starting point within our funds should enable us to outperform during any future wobbles in risk assets. We will also be able to take advantage of any significant spread widening to step back into the market at more attractive valuation levels.
US investment grade credit returned 1.3% in February, with spreads widening 11bps. We are still seeing little concession in new issuances, which we expect to lead to a period of market indigestion.
Fears shifted away from overinvestment in AI capex towards AI disruption. Industries with a perceived higher exposure to being replaced by AI agents such as insurance, asset managers and software companies (included within technology) saw their spreads widen significantly. This followed a report from Citrini Research exploring a hypothetical future scenario where AI is able to alleviate frictions in the economy, which reduces dependence on these companies.
We are steering clear of issuers with private credit exposure as it is exposed to highly levered software companies, which have close to zero recovery value in the event of default. Our underweight here includes business development companies, which we think still have room for further spread widening.
Weakness in sectors exposed to AI disruption
Source: Fidelity International, Bloomberg, February 2026.
Euro IG credit returned 0.5% in February with spreads widening 9bps. Although spreads have widened slightly over the month, they remain close to all time tights. As such, we are maintaining our underweight to credit risk as we expect some further widening.
We also think that credit spreads are still priced for perfection and generally offer insufficient compensation for additional risk. This means that we still have a preference for high quality, defensive issuers.
Sterling IG credit returned 1.3% in February with spreads widening by 11bps. We are seeing lots of volatility in individual names, especially within the technology sector. In our view, this reinforces the value of bottom-up research and active management as we are in a credit picking market.
Asia IG credit returned 1.3% in February with spreads widening 5bps. The market has remained reasonably calm, and new issue performance YTD has been strong.
Outlook
Global HY returned 0.3% in February, with spreads widening by 20bps, as AI-related uncertainty increased dispersion across regions and ratings. More recently, market focus has shifted to geopolitical escalation, although AI remains a structural theme for leveraged finance markets. Lower-quality spreads have begun to widen and issuance remains elevated, signalling more selective risk appetite.
With valuations still tight, we maintain a neutral stance on Global HY, expecting returns to be primarily income-driven rather than supported by further broad-based spread compression.
US HY posted 0.2% in February, with spreads widening by 24 bps. Concerns around AI-related disruption and mixed Q4 earnings increased dispersion, with higher-quality credits outperforming and CCC-rated bonds lagging. Technology exposure in US HY is approximately 4%, well below leveraged loans (mid-teens) and private credit or BDCs (over 20%), limiting systemic risk, though single-name volatility remains elevated.
US HY: BB vs CCC spread divergence
Source: Fidelity International, ICE BofA, 28 February 2026.
With spreads near the tighter end of historical ranges and yields at 6.8%, compensation for risk appears limited. Market technicals remain stable, and distressed levels have not materially increased. Given tight valuations and asymmetric downside risks, we maintain a neutral stance on US HY.
European HY posted 0.3% in February, with spreads tightening by 17 bps. Returns were supported by carry and resilient technicals, although dispersion remained elevated amid tariff uncertainty and volatility in parts of the software sector. Geopolitical escalation in the Middle East has triggered a renewed risk-averse move, with oil prices rising and investors shifting toward safe-haven assets. European risk assets have repriced amid concerns over potential supply disruptions through the Strait of Hormuz, weighing on airlines, cruises, shipping and chemicals. Fund flows remain orderly, although spreads are starting from relatively tight levels.
Given elevated geopolitical uncertainty, ongoing AI repricing and rich valuations, we have moved from positive to a neutral stance on European HY. Technical conditions remain supportive, but upside from current levels appears constrained relative to downside risks. We expect returns to be primarily income-driven, with performance increasingly dependent on selective positioning rather than broad-based spread tightening.
EHY: Issuance and net supply trends (€bn)
Source: Fidelity International, JP Morgan, ex. Financials, 25 February 2026.
Asia HY returned 0.9% in February, with spreads tightening by 26 bps, supported by carry and constructive technicals. Geopolitical escalation in the Middle East has become a key external risk, primarily through higher oil prices and their impact on inflation, trade balances and growth across energy-importing economies. While spreads have remained resilient, elevated uncertainty and relatively tight valuations support a neutral stance.
Outlook
Emerging market debt generated positive returns in February. Declining US Treasury yields provided a supportive backdrop for hard currency assets, although spread widening limited overall gains. Local markets benefited from currency appreciation earlier in the month, while carry remained an important contributor.
Tensions intensified following US and Israeli strikes on Iran, prompting retaliatory actions across the Gulf and renewed disruption risks around key shipping routes, including the Strait of Hormuz. The rise in oil prices and a shift toward risk aversion added a geopolitical premium to EM assets and increased volatility across rates and FX markets.
Sovereigns outpaced corporates as lower core yields offset wider spreads, while country-specific developments drove relative returns. Structural arguments in favour of EM debt remain intact, including improving policy credibility and still-supportive growth differentials, yet near-term positioning appears stretched: selective FX allocations are elevated, rate markets discounting policy easing and credit valuations screen rich.
While higher oil prices strengthen the fiscal outlook for wealthier Gulf exporters, we have stayed cautious on lower-rated regional issuers. As risks mounted, we became more cautious in more exposed local markets such as South Africa and Mexico.
EM spreads remain tight despite recent uptick
Source: Fidelity International, Bloomberg, JP Morgan, 27 February 2026.
In this environment of heightened uncertainty and richer valuations, we are prioritising quality, liquidity and flexibility. We have moved to a neutral stance in hard currency sovereigns, focusing on selective opportunities rather than broad beta exposure and favouring issuers with resilient balance sheets and reliable market access. A similar approach applies to EM corporate credit, where carry remains supportive but spreads offer limited room for further compression.
Across local markets, inflation has moderated in many economies, although higher energy costs present upside risks, particularly for net importers. Central bank credibility and still-attractive real yields provide a degree of support, yet much of the anticipated easing cycle is reflected in current pricing. We have therefore shifted to a neutral overall position in local duration, maintaining targeted exposures while avoiding markets where the balance of risks appears skewed.
EM FX retraces lately as geopolitics drive volatility
Source: Fidelity International, Bloomberg, JP Morgan, as of 04 March 2026
EM currencies were supported earlier in the period. Later, as tensions intensified, volatility increased amid geopolitical developments and intermittent US dollar strength. We have reduced long EM currency exposure and trimmed short US dollar positions, moving toward a more diversified funding basket that includes euros.
We prefer currencies with robust fundamentals and sustainable carry, while we remain cautious on those vulnerable to policy intervention or capital controls. A disciplined, selective stance remains appropriate in the current environment.
Quant tactical scorecard explained
Important information
Reference to specific securities should not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell these securities and is included for the purposes of illustration only.
Investors should note that the views expressed may no longer be current and may have already been acted upon.
The value of investments and the income from them can go down as well as up so you may get back less than you invest. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.
Bond investments: The price of bonds is influenced by movements in interest rates, changes in the credit rating of bond issuers, and other factors such as inflation and market dynamics. In general, as interest rates rise the price of a bond will fall. The risk of default is based on the issuer's ability to make interest payments and to repay the loan at maturity. Default risk may, therefore, vary between different government issuers as well as between different corporate issuers.
Corporate bonds: Due to the greater possibility of default an investment in a corporate bond is generally less secure than an investment in government bonds.
High yield bonds: Sub-investment grade bonds are considered riskier bonds. They have an increased risk of default which could affect both income and the capital value of the Fund investing in them.
Overseas Markets: Overseas investments will be affected by movements in currency exchange rates. The value of the investment can be affected by changes in currency exchange rates.
Currency Hedging: Currency hedging is used to substantially reduce the risk of losses from unfavourable exchange rate movements on holdings in currencies that differ from the dealing currency. Hedging also has the effect of limiting the potential for currency gains to be made.
Emerging Markets: Investing in emerging markets can be more volatile than other more developed markets.
Derivatives: Some fixed income investments may make use of derivatives and this may result in leverage. In such situations performance may rise or fall more than it would have done otherwise, and expose investors to the risk of financial loss if a counterparty used for derivative instruments subsequently defaults.
Hybrid securities: Hybrid securities typically combine both equity and debt sensitivities and exposures. Hybrid bonds are subordinated instruments that have equity like characteristics. Typically, they include long final maturity (or no limitation on maturity) and have a call schedule increasing reinvestment risk. Their subordination typically lies somewhere between equity and other subordinated debt. As such, as well as typical ‘bond’ risk factors, hybrid securities also convey such risks as the deferral of interest payments, equity market volatility and illiquidity. Contingent convertible securities (“CoCos”) are a form of hybrid debt security that are intended to either convert into equity or have their principal written down upon the occurrence of certain ‘triggers’ linked to regulatory capital thresholds or where the issuing banking institution’s regulatory authorities considers this to be necessary. CoCos will have unique equity conversion or principal write-down features which are tailored to the issuing banking institution and its regulatory requirements.
This material is for Institutional Investors and Investment Professionals only, and should not be distributed to the general public or be relied upon by private investors.
This material is provided for information purposes only and is intended only for the person or entity to which it is sent. It must not be reproduced or circulated to any other party without prior permission of Fidelity.
This material does not constitute a distribution, an offer or solicitation to engage the investment management services of Fidelity, or an offer to buy or sell or the solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any securities in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or offer is not authorised or would be contrary to local laws or regulations. Fidelity makes no representations that the contents are appropriate for use in all locations or that the transactions or services discussed are available or appropriate for sale or use in all jurisdictions or countries or by all investors or counterparties.
This communication is not directed at, and must not be acted on by persons inside the United States. All persons and entities accessing the information do so on their own initiative and are responsible for compliance with applicable local laws and regulations and should consult their professional advisers. This material may contain materials from third-parties which are supplied by companies that are not affiliated with any Fidelity entity (Third-Party Content). Fidelity has not been involved in the preparation, adoption or editing of such third-party materials and does not explicitly or implicitly endorse or approve such content. Fidelity International is not responsible for any errors or omissions relating to specific information provided by third parties.
Fidelity International refers to the group of companies which form the global investment management organization that provides products and services in designated jurisdictions outside of North America. Fidelity, Fidelity International, the Fidelity International logo and F symbol are trademarks of FIL Limited. Fidelity only offers information on products and services and does not provide investment advice based on individual circumstances, other than when specifically stipulated by an appropriately authorised firm, in a formal communication with the client.
Any performance disclosure is not compliant with German regulations regarding retail clients and must therefore not be handed out to these.
Investments should be made on the basis of the current prospectus (in German) and the KID (key investor document) in English and German, which is available along with the current annual and semi-annual reports free of charge through Fidelity International , Fidelity International or can be requested free of charge via Globale Anlagelösungen | Fidelity International | Deutschland.
For German Wholesale clients issued by FIL Investment Services GmbH, Kastanienhöhe 1, 61476 Kronberg im Taunus.
For German Pension clients issued by FIL Finance Services GmbH, Kastanienhöhe 1, 61476 Kronberg im Taunus. Investors/ potential investors can obtain information on their respective rights regarding complaints and litigation on the following link: Beschwerdemanagement (Beschwerdemanagement) in German.
For German Institutional clients issued by FIL Investment Management (Luxembourg) S.à r.l., 2a, rue Albert Borschette BP 2174 L-1021 Luxembourg. Investors/ potential investors can obtain information on their respective rights regarding complaints and litigation on the following link: Fidelity International in English. The information above includes disclosure requirements of the fund’s management company according to Regulation (EU) 2019/1156.
MK17481